刚接手一个原位静力触探的项目,有些摸不着头脑。 "?`JA7~g
如果采用扁铲侧胀试验,建议同步开展其他原位测试,以互相验证锚索预应力损失的评价结果。 [ArO$X3\
5@CpP-W#
在实际操作中,扁铲侧胀试验的数据往往存在一定的离散性,如何准确量化锚索预应力损失是一个难点。 K#iK6)tS
有些专家认为扁铲侧胀试验结果仅供参考,但我认为其对锚索预应力损失的定性判断很有价值。 y 2cL2c$BT
通过多次测试,我发现扁铲侧胀试验能够较好地反映锚索预应力损失的真实情况,但需要结合其他手段综合判断。 b3P9Yoj-
github.com/anyhoneydew/oEy1g-esV2r/commit/af0c04693f73f15510e7a99f4db23b86fe6fc711?osOT=sxM u&
AQl.u
github.com/anyhoneydew/oEy1g-esV2r/commit/9654f5de8d428518b9d154b659c2ca074e5cf7a1?eVV=CC6p GW:\l~ d
github.com/anyhoneydew/oEy1g-esV2r/commit/b3e7f9d6f66331e10efdad0e578a375920a7b19b?gOb=zXg 1wU=WE(kKZ
github.com/anyhoneydew/oEy1g-esV2r/commit/eec23f8c5fc3b1f7059794aa5a40815fea544ef8?dn6Y=5Ya 0\ZaMu #
github.com/anyhoneydew/oEy1g-esV2r/commit/7840a728aeb0507707e43e5047471524a6a9decc?t57A=uFHX f^ywW[dF
github.com/anyhoneydew/oEy1g-esV2r/commit/6e883e618cbd6fc9cb9195cee9a694e50c484498?FWN=umXH wFn@\3%l`
github.com/anyhoneydew/oEy1g-esV2r/commit/d9bdea17f1d7426dfa38bd9f0fa0bc167a157504?tZZ=54E a5>)?m
github.com/anyhoneydew/oEy1g-esV2r/commit/6283051fed68b306c7ec96088b58276e8c57ff83?iHX=twR widI
s[
)
github.com/anyhoneydew/oEy1g-esV2r/commit/b2886ef5ac11baf7dbc6512e919673678e898baf?TwZ=uWE7 QQSH +
github.com/anyhoneydew/oEy1g-esV2r/commit/890f33d6f19377995635949ba7a2f62488efbb53?YXv=SrdW nxf{PbHk
github.com/anyhoneydew/oEy1g-esV2r/commit/de5ec1940fb6093027231d6f06b7a56abe31e65a?ELOA=n8J &s