[探讨]Question 1: why the displacements in 2D analysis are a little bigger than that in 3D analysis? [复制链接]

The whole question is: NE"@Bk cm  
X>d"]GD  
Question 1: why the lateral displacements in 2D(plain strain) analysis are a little bigger than that in 3D analysis based on static analysis in general? DNOueU  
Ov};e  
Who can explain that in theory? Welcome to discuss and comment! f1`gdQ)H  
Z,RzN5eN  
I will set up the question series in numerical analysis. 9*2[B"5  
O,J>/  
Prize:flower

2D(平面应变)忽略了两个侧面上的剪应力的作用，故计算出的位移要比3D的大，在边坡中，即算的安全系数要比3D的偏小，因而2D分析是偏保守的。至于从理论上讨论，估计得从弹塑性理论上去考虑，我没有研究过，呵呵。

简单来说,２Ｄ没有空间效应。 !Nu<xq@!  
就拿基坑来说，如果变长很长一般就可以不考虑空间效应；当然也可以分块开挖，分块浇筑底板，以利用空间效应。 W0(_~  
至于理论上，同意楼上的看法，就是３Ｄ分析考虑了相邻ｓｌｉｃｅ之间的剪切，减应力一直传递到截面变化处。

我现在做两个算例比较. CKtB-a  
算例一:平面应变问题的稳定性; TkE 8D n  
算例二:采用相同平面,在轴线方向拉伸后的稳定性,其中两个端面固定;

平面计算,Fs=2.2

3D计算结果,Fs=2.3

实际上当沿着轴线足够长的话,3D的稳定系数越来越接近2D问题,这在某方面说明了3D的边界效应. X#7}c5^Y  
v,*Q]r0m  
上面分析中,取分析精度Fs=0.1

geofem 兄，有个小小的问题，从你的途上可以看出潜在的滑体了，不知道在你这个软件中如何把这个滑体的地面给勾勒出来，如果能把滑体勾勒出来，进行一下3D极限平衡分析与3D有限元强度折减法计算结果的比较可能更有意义，呵呵。以前我在FLAC3D中想这么做，难度太大，没有做下去 。

用强度折减法分析边坡稳定性确实存在滑裂面难以确定的问题。一般计算结果与其说是滑裂面还不如说是滑动带比较合适。 l\Cu1r-z  
一般可以用J2应变，或者位移云彩图大致判断出滑裂面的位置。但是，有的土结构相互作用的例子，判断的时候就有些困难了。

Thank for "geofem" and "benjackxu" A{M+vsL  
6."PS4}:  
In 2D plain strain analysis, it is assumed that strain in z direction is zero and shear sigma zx , sigma zy are zero. gu!](yEgl  
3M
xz_~  
How's the shear affect?  As "geofem" said  that is "three-dimensional effect'. How is the "three-dimensional effect'?  )*Vj3Jx  
iA&oLu[y3  
For a certain work, the energy release is governed by force and displacements in three-dimensional space in reality.  In Z direction, it should be have energy i#tbdx#  
qz87iJp&  
release(0.5*stress*strain^2), since strain in z direction is zero , the energy release will be zero in this direction, in other word, all the external work will be taken by the other two directions, J$#D:KaU:N  
$)l2G;&  
which cause bigger displacements.  Is this one of  three-dimensional effects? /t$*W\PL@  
F/xCG nP-  
Welcome more discussion!

Thanks for your explanation. Your explanation focuses on energy dissipation.Could you explain it  from  the other aspect such as analytic demonstration through plasto elasticity? |F
jBKj  
My english is poor , could you understand what i write above? 5'62ulwMP=  
xg{VP7  
The study of "three-dimensional effect" often focuses on the geometrical effect of the geologic model.

You may try to take a look Mindlin theory that explains the shear effect. There are terms(negative) from shear stresses in the displacements calculation if the strain in Z direction is not equal zero.  V*>73I  
9n-T5WP  
Hope some help!