论坛首页    职业区    学术与写作    工程技术区    软件区    资料区    商务合作区    社区办公室
 您好! 欢迎 登录 或 注册 最新帖子 邀请注册 活动聚焦 统计排行 社区服务 帮助
 
  • 帖子
  • 日志
  • 用户
  • 版块
  • 群组
帖子
  • 2202阅读
  • 2回复

“千人计划”入选者王志国因造假被加拿大蒙特利尔心脏病研究所关闭实验室(转载) [复制链接]

上一主题 下一主题
离线jeffisonno1
 

发帖
2339
土币
32555
威望
2070
原创币
0
只看楼主 倒序阅读 使用道具 楼主  发表于: 2011-09-06
  • 作者:新语丝
  • 来自:新语丝
“千人计划”入选者王志国因造假被加拿大蒙特利尔心脏病研究所关闭实验室 gw#5jW\  
"& ])lz[u  
“千人计划”入选者、加拿大蒙特利尔心脏病研究所兼蒙特利尔大学教授王志国 mHV%I@`Y6  
因为论文造假,被蒙特利尔心脏病研究所关闭实验室。他发表的两篇与中国工程 RDW8]=uM  
院院士、哈尔滨医科大学教授杨宝峰课题组合作的论文已因造假撤稿,还有3篇 )97SnCkal  
论文被要求撤稿。 h`KFL/fT  
hn5h\M?  
Canadian Press Zn&, t &z  
K0-ypU*P  
Date: Friday Sep. 2, 2011 6:50 PM ET HePUWL'  
5]KW^sL  
MONTREAL — A Montreal hospital has dismissed a renowned cardiac |^:cG4e  
researcher over allegations of scientific misconduct, a case that Gw>^[dmt!  
could throw medical studies based on his work into doubt. FQu8 vwV6>  
d4u})  
The Montreal Heart Institute revoked Zhiguo Wang's research privileges e@Fo^#ImDx  
Friday and shuttered his laboratory -- for good. lD)%s!  
Rp.Sj{<2  
The hospital says it launched an investigation earlier this summer zL$@`Eh-KP  
after Wang, who has received millions in federal grants since 1999, *w^C"^*  
alerted the institution that he voluntarily retracted two of his f[<m<I  
articles from scientific journals. B:5Rr}eY+  
K-bD<X  
The institute's research director alleges an independent body of *W.C7=  
investigators concluded Wang's work did not meet its standards for <;vbsksZeH  
scientific conduct. >zw.GwN|  
5b*M*e&=C  
"It's very serious," Dr. Jean-Claude Tardif told a news conference En~5"yW5>]  
Friday at the hospital. ',Y.v"']4  
'8Q]C*Z  
"The reason this is important is that research, like a lot of other +c(zo4nZ  
things nowadays, is global. ^T*?>%`  
!nqUBa  
"We need to be absolutely certain that the results that are published ykl .1(  
and shared with the rest of the scientific community around the world u[@l~gwL  
are indeed exact and respect our highest scientific principles." Eo{"9j\  
g[1gF&  
Tardif said the primary results and conclusions in the studies are F~T]u2qt  
still valid, despite the alleged abnormalities in Wang's research. He $G8E 3|k  
added that most of the findings in the research have been duplicated o)Iff)m$  
in the works of other scientists. $;1#To  
)m`<H>[Eb=  
Still, he said the hospital had concerns with how images used in the Rn}l6kbM  
research were manipulated -- and that it must enforce strict vMA]j>>  
scientific standards. wN@oYFoL  
hBS.a6u1'd  
Wang did not immediately respond to interview requests on Friday. f%SZg!+t  
[b 6R%  
Both studies in question were published in different editions of the JLnH&(O  
Journal of Biological Chemistry -- one in 2007 and the other in 2008. {K+i cTL3  
sPr~=,F  
One paper was partially funded with federal cash through the Canadian C<NLE-  
Institutes of Health Research, while the other received financial o C<.=2]  
support from the Canadian Diabetes Association. \]</w5 Pi,  
4lr(,nPRD  
The chair of the Canadian Diabetes Association's national research n"c)m%yZ  
council warned that scientists who have since cited Wang's research H\h3 TdL  
might have to recheck their findings. < vL,*.zd  
1;C+$  
"People have to go back now and look at their work and see if it was 1,6}_MA  
based on something in that paper that wasn't correct," Dr. Bruce @W s*QTlV  
Verchere said Friday in an interview. Lx\ 8Z=  
i*|\KM?P  
Wang, an award-winning researcher, is no longer eligible to apply for J3e96t~u  
grants from Verchere's association, which has provided more than K~AR*1??[  
$300,000 for his work since 2003. '10oK {m$  
(zgW%{V@  
"It's a shock for us ... because it's donor funds and it's hard to get 0xxg|;h.,g  
funds," said Verchere, who doubts his organization will be able to O[I\A[*  
recoup the money. BcL{se9<  
~<O7$~  
"We want to fund the best research -- the research that's going to Jy)KqdkX+  
help find a cure, and if the money's not being put to that, it could D ~stM  
have been put to other excellent research." kO,zZF&  
".W8)  
The Canadian Diabetes Association isn't the only group that lost its <vUbv   
investment. +1uF !G&l  
KV}FZ3jY  
The Canadian Institutes of Health Research said it has granted Wang a k,85Y$`'  
total of $4.2 million since 1999, though it did not reveal how much iI\oz&!vH  
was supplied for the now-retracted study. [0(B>a3J  
S0B|#O%Z  
The allegations first made news headlines last month when the Journal O #F   
of Biological Chemistry listed the titles of the previously published 4,sJE2"[9  
articles, but this time with the following statement: "This article \?Z{hmN  
has been withdrawn by the authors." xAK6pDp  
+b.g$CRr  
Tardif, who estimated that tens of thousands have likely read the .LZwuJ^;  
papers in question, said the hospital's investigation has also $CY~5A`l9  
prompted recommendations that three more of Wang's published articles 6N",- c  
be retracted. 43|XSyS  
z2MWN\?8  
He said allegations of scientific misconduct have surfaced elsewhere eFaO7mz5V%  
in Canada and internationally, but noted this was a first in the "]"|"0#i  
hospital's nearly 60-year history. 1M}5>V{  
tasIDoo+!J  
Tardif also stressed that Wang, who is not a physician, worked behind G f,`  
a microscope and never had contact with patients or their medications. ,24p%KJ*X  
{{B%f.   
Wang, who won a pair of prestigious awards in China in 2009 for ix([mQg  
cardiovascular disease research, is also a professor in the faculty of 7({]x*o*%  
medicine at Universite de Montreal. zfc'=ODX  
SW*"\X;  
He led a team of researchers at the hospital who studied cardiac :ctu5{"UJ  
arrhythmias -- the rate and rhythm of the heartbeat. _oHNkKQ  
Yn@lr6s  
Tardif said Wang published many scientific articles in high-profile :K-~fA%kt?  
journals while working at the Montreal Heart Institute for close to 20 fuWO*  
years. W yB3ls~  
S#MZV@nGF  
"So, he has certainly contributed in a significant way over the last E;Y;z  
two decades with his scientific work and (he) has given scientific )CuZDf@  
talks in important scientific sessions around the world," he said. N):tOD@B  
$* AYcy7  
离线lanke

发帖
375
土币
3184
威望
2
原创币
0
只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2011-09-25
看不懂,全英语~
离线lxrycn

发帖
102
土币
496
威望
0
原创币
0
只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2011-10-28
以后应该叫999人计划了
快速回复
限100 字节
温馨提示:欢迎交流讨论,请勿纯表情、纯引用!
 
上一个 下一个

      https://beian.mps.gov.cn/ 粤公网安备 44010602012919号 广州半山岩土网络科技有限公司 粤ICP备2024274469号

      工业和信息化部备案管理系统网站