论坛首页    职业区    学术与写作    工程技术区    软件区    资料区    商务合作区    社区办公室
 您好! 欢迎 登录 或 注册 最新帖子 邀请注册 活动聚焦 统计排行 社区服务 帮助
 
  • 帖子
  • 日志
  • 用户
  • 版块
  • 群组
帖子
  • 2204阅读
  • 2回复

“千人计划”入选者王志国因造假被加拿大蒙特利尔心脏病研究所关闭实验室(转载) [复制链接]

上一主题 下一主题
离线jeffisonno1
 

发帖
2339
土币
32555
威望
2070
原创币
0
只看楼主 倒序阅读 使用道具 楼主  发表于: 2011-09-06
  • 作者:新语丝
  • 来自:新语丝
“千人计划”入选者王志国因造假被加拿大蒙特利尔心脏病研究所关闭实验室 kzjuW  
{G Jl<G1  
“千人计划”入选者、加拿大蒙特利尔心脏病研究所兼蒙特利尔大学教授王志国 6q\*{_CPB  
因为论文造假,被蒙特利尔心脏病研究所关闭实验室。他发表的两篇与中国工程 8f/KNh7#s  
院院士、哈尔滨医科大学教授杨宝峰课题组合作的论文已因造假撤稿,还有3篇 {g! 7K  
论文被要求撤稿。 _Z Sp$>)/  
Bl*}*SPU  
Canadian Press J\r\_P@;c  
]bJz-6u#:  
Date: Friday Sep. 2, 2011 6:50 PM ET +U2lwd!j  
1!KROes4  
MONTREAL — A Montreal hospital has dismissed a renowned cardiac P{-- R\  
researcher over allegations of scientific misconduct, a case that E?G'F3i  
could throw medical studies based on his work into doubt. {YgU23;q  
iCPm7AU  
The Montreal Heart Institute revoked Zhiguo Wang's research privileges U\p`YZ  
Friday and shuttered his laboratory -- for good. R>* z8n  
*^uK=CH1?(  
The hospital says it launched an investigation earlier this summer %(1O jfZc  
after Wang, who has received millions in federal grants since 1999, ~<?Zj  
alerted the institution that he voluntarily retracted two of his RkE)2q[5  
articles from scientific journals. *3H=t$1G}  
@QQ%09*  
The institute's research director alleges an independent body of g#=<;X2  
investigators concluded Wang's work did not meet its standards for >I|8yqbfm  
scientific conduct. st;iGg  
b2OwLt9  
"It's very serious," Dr. Jean-Claude Tardif told a news conference GLn=*Dh#  
Friday at the hospital. Tb$))O}  
 SvT0%2  
"The reason this is important is that research, like a lot of other 1o`1W4Q  
things nowadays, is global. Qds<j{2  
rXi&8R[  
"We need to be absolutely certain that the results that are published <NMJkl-r8r  
and shared with the rest of the scientific community around the world =P]Z"Ok  
are indeed exact and respect our highest scientific principles." &em~+83  
&t[[4+Qt  
Tardif said the primary results and conclusions in the studies are c|k_[8L  
still valid, despite the alleged abnormalities in Wang's research. He Cgx:6TRS  
added that most of the findings in the research have been duplicated b^VRpv  
in the works of other scientists. nwU],{(Hgr  
E{<#h9=>  
Still, he said the hospital had concerns with how images used in the ^e8xg=8(  
research were manipulated -- and that it must enforce strict } Bf@69  
scientific standards. !fzS' pkk.  
DjM*U52Yfj  
Wang did not immediately respond to interview requests on Friday. -Cs( 3[  
 u]Ku96!  
Both studies in question were published in different editions of the fAgeF$9@  
Journal of Biological Chemistry -- one in 2007 and the other in 2008. s/tLY/U/  
{  c#US  
One paper was partially funded with federal cash through the Canadian w'K7$F51  
Institutes of Health Research, while the other received financial YGJ!!(~r  
support from the Canadian Diabetes Association. 1z PS#K/3  
`(FjOd K  
The chair of the Canadian Diabetes Association's national research ENuL!H>;*  
council warned that scientists who have since cited Wang's research `eM ZhY o  
might have to recheck their findings. !0W(f.A{K  
ENZym  
"People have to go back now and look at their work and see if it was -G.N  
based on something in that paper that wasn't correct," Dr. Bruce MY,~leP&  
Verchere said Friday in an interview. bzFac5n)Q  
^OKm (  
Wang, an award-winning researcher, is no longer eligible to apply for ?6CLUu|7n  
grants from Verchere's association, which has provided more than )8A.Wg4S;c  
$300,000 for his work since 2003. t`Kpbfk  
@3.Z>KONx  
"It's a shock for us ... because it's donor funds and it's hard to get ga;nM#/  
funds," said Verchere, who doubts his organization will be able to itYoR-XJ  
recoup the money. 9;+&}:IVS  
0vqVE]C  
"We want to fund the best research -- the research that's going to 2Mt$Dah  
help find a cure, and if the money's not being put to that, it could w a_{\v=  
have been put to other excellent research." {Dpsr` &  
V vrsf6l]  
The Canadian Diabetes Association isn't the only group that lost its ,^([aK  
investment. I?'*vAW<  
O2Qmz=%  
The Canadian Institutes of Health Research said it has granted Wang a ] 0X|_bU  
total of $4.2 million since 1999, though it did not reveal how much p< 7rF_?W0  
was supplied for the now-retracted study. @P7'MiP]K  
G'\[dwD,u  
The allegations first made news headlines last month when the Journal dPEDsG0$a  
of Biological Chemistry listed the titles of the previously published ^ 8}P_  
articles, but this time with the following statement: "This article N;3!oo4  
has been withdrawn by the authors." 0`x>p6.)G  
gy}3ZA*F  
Tardif, who estimated that tens of thousands have likely read the  ;j26(dH  
papers in question, said the hospital's investigation has also 8g0 #WV  
prompted recommendations that three more of Wang's published articles 9<u&27.  
be retracted. HPt3WBRzS;  
!, BJO3&  
He said allegations of scientific misconduct have surfaced elsewhere ^*}D*=>\  
in Canada and internationally, but noted this was a first in the R4'.QZ-x  
hospital's nearly 60-year history. $VmV>NZ  
9WG=3!-@  
Tardif also stressed that Wang, who is not a physician, worked behind ?{ )'O+s  
a microscope and never had contact with patients or their medications. cg8/v:B  
th{f|fm62  
Wang, who won a pair of prestigious awards in China in 2009 for |HycBTN#E  
cardiovascular disease research, is also a professor in the faculty of /(^-= pAX  
medicine at Universite de Montreal. KR ( apO  
VeWh9:"bJ  
He led a team of researchers at the hospital who studied cardiac KNeVSZT  
arrhythmias -- the rate and rhythm of the heartbeat. sWlxt qg  
Z?+ )ox  
Tardif said Wang published many scientific articles in high-profile 9 Zos;  
journals while working at the Montreal Heart Institute for close to 20 NPH(v`  
years. p%$r\G-x  
hl:Ba2_E +  
"So, he has certainly contributed in a significant way over the last hoFgs9  
two decades with his scientific work and (he) has given scientific ! V.]mI  
talks in important scientific sessions around the world," he said. jA1S|gV  
Q#%LIkeq  
离线lanke

发帖
375
土币
3184
威望
2
原创币
0
只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2011-09-25
看不懂,全英语~
离线lxrycn

发帖
102
土币
496
威望
0
原创币
0
只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2011-10-28
以后应该叫999人计划了
快速回复
限100 字节
温馨提示:欢迎交流讨论,请勿纯表情、纯引用!
 
上一个 下一个

      https://beian.mps.gov.cn/ 粤公网安备 44010602012919号 广州半山岩土网络科技有限公司 粤ICP备2024274469号

      工业和信息化部备案管理系统网站