" bB1UZ O
Some points you may concern: xqG[~)~
*U,@q4
1) M-C model, undrained condition, effective stress analysis: \F/hMXDlJ
In this case, the plasticity can be predicted as usual; q$Zh@
rrBsb -
2)M-C model, undrained condition, total stress analysis: Ez
fN&8E
KyYM fC
In this case, there is not effective stress calculation due to no pore pressure generated. #FCnA
$0>60<J
The total stress analysis plasticity occurs as soon as the total stresses reach the failure :toh0oB[
-$cmG4
criterium while with an effective stresses analysis plasticity occurs when the effective stresses =JK@z
%,}A@H,
reach the failure criterium. -w}]fb2Q>
>,$_| C
The latter is of course more realistic; only the effective stresses determine plasticity, not the water pressures. i1NY9br
mGJKvJF
In other words, using total stress analysis is only correct when the calculation is elastic. But this case is not very often in reality. 8pIP
lm-dW'7&
Suggestion: Try to use effective stress analysis when it is undrained condition (typically, there is option for this in PLAXIS)." |Mup8(gCk
=S+wCN
"1) M-C model, undrained condition, effective stress analysis: e.7EU
In this case, the plasticity can be predicted as usual;" @s ?
2)M-C model, undrained condition, total stress analysis: 5HkKurab
0ghGBuv1s
In this case, there is not effective stress calculation due to no pore pressure generate `>f6)C-
(:TjoXXiY
THESE STATEMENT DO NOT MAKE SENSE TO ME.