" `Se2f0",
Some points you may concern: twu,yC!
IG{lr
1) M-C model, undrained condition, effective stress analysis: gW<6dP'v
In this case, the plasticity can be predicted as usual; }hsNsQ
h\p!J-V
2)M-C model, undrained condition, total stress analysis: n5%\FFG0M
E~#G_opQA
In this case, there is not effective stress calculation due to no pore pressure generated. $KQ q~|
c4u/tt.)
The total stress analysis plasticity occurs as soon as the total stresses reach the failure YKz#,
P-a8S*RRa
criterium while with an effective stresses analysis plasticity occurs when the effective stresses q9dplEe5
Y0Tad?iC
reach the failure criterium. {i+
o'Lw
a4.w2GR
The latter is of course more realistic; only the effective stresses determine plasticity, not the water pressures. lu00@~rx/
n"`V|
UTHP
In other words, using total stress analysis is only correct when the calculation is elastic. But this case is not very often in reality. ?=LT
^Zp`
rFGPS%STS
Suggestion: Try to use effective stress analysis when it is undrained condition (typically, there is option for this in PLAXIS)." Qd~z<U l
R `Fgne$4
"1) M-C model, undrained condition, effective stress analysis: \vJ0Mhk1
In this case, the plasticity can be predicted as usual;" Ph%{h"
2)M-C model, undrained condition, total stress analysis: ]ag{sU@#
SXP(C^?C
In this case, there is not effective stress calculation due to no pore pressure generate Q5}XD
'pT13RFD
THESE STATEMENT DO NOT MAKE SENSE TO ME.