With conventional force-based seismic design, the most important information for the structural P_dJZ((X
engineer has been the effective peak ground acceleration. This number is comparatively P&q7|ST%N
insignificant in displacement-based or performance-based seismic design, where the key data are e*!kZAf
peak spectral response displacement, and the “corner” period at which this occurs. There appears ?8 {"x8W;
to be a disagreement between seismologists on opposite sides of the Atlantic about these data, m3ff;,
which the structural engineer views with concern, since ductile structural response will often be in {|\.i
this region of the corner period. Dependable information on the reduction of displacement _wOt39e&
response with damping or ductility is also needed for design approaches utilizing secant stiffness +)?J#g
characterization. Other areas needing clarification include the issue of how to develop Ha ]YJ}
accelerograms for time-history analysis compatible with the design seismicity using an acceptably kR9-8I{J
small number of accelerograms, and how to reconcile the statistical nature of seismicity qa6,z.mQ
characterization with the structural engineer’s preference for deterministic analysis. There is some 66 Tpi![
evidence that a consequence of this is invalid averaging of response characteristics by structural or]IZ2^n
engineers.