With conventional force-based seismic design, the most important information for the structural 4|#WFLo@
engineer has been the effective peak ground acceleration. This number is comparatively >~+ELVB&
insignificant in displacement-based or performance-based seismic design, where the key data are t.\dpBq
peak spectral response displacement, and the “corner” period at which this occurs. There appears *EwR!L*
to be a disagreement between seismologists on opposite sides of the Atlantic about these data, 0Z]!/AsC
which the structural engineer views with concern, since ductile structural response will often be in ',5ky{
this region of the corner period. Dependable information on the reduction of displacement Yk Qd
response with damping or ductility is also needed for design approaches utilizing secant stiffness =zs`#-^8
characterization. Other areas needing clarification include the issue of how to develop 1hNq8*|
accelerograms for time-history analysis compatible with the design seismicity using an acceptably _/<x
small number of accelerograms, and how to reconcile the statistical nature of seismicity n>U5R_T
characterization with the structural engineer’s preference for deterministic analysis. There is some |)/aGZ+
evidence that a consequence of this is invalid averaging of response characteristics by structural 2jCf T>`3
engineers.