With conventional force-based seismic design, the most important information for the structural q'9}Hz
engineer has been the effective peak ground acceleration. This number is comparatively ?7| 6jTIs
insignificant in displacement-based or performance-based seismic design, where the key data are .$]%gjIBCl
peak spectral response displacement, and the “corner” period at which this occurs. There appears ~tM+!
to be a disagreement between seismologists on opposite sides of the Atlantic about these data, u6#FG9W7
which the structural engineer views with concern, since ductile structural response will often be in %p d-{KR
this region of the corner period. Dependable information on the reduction of displacement $>*TO1gb+
response with damping or ductility is also needed for design approaches utilizing secant stiffness @a]O(S>Ub
characterization. Other areas needing clarification include the issue of how to develop Gm1[PAj
accelerograms for time-history analysis compatible with the design seismicity using an acceptably 2N/4.
small number of accelerograms, and how to reconcile the statistical nature of seismicity y/9aI/O'
characterization with the structural engineer’s preference for deterministic analysis. There is some 5,~Ju>y*
evidence that a consequence of this is invalid averaging of response characteristics by structural c|hT\1XR,
engineers.