" EJMd[hMhe
Some points you may concern: m.
p'LF
(aC=,5N
1) M-C model, undrained condition, effective stress analysis: u\=
05N6G
In this case, the plasticity can be predicted as usual; j|`lOH8
Otx>S' 5
2)M-C model, undrained condition, total stress analysis: r_T"b
<[-{:dH,5
In this case, there is not effective stress calculation due to no pore pressure generated. r@]`#PL
N*6~$zl&
The total stress analysis plasticity occurs as soon as the total stresses reach the failure }9W[7V?
o|vL:| 8Q
criterium while with an effective stresses analysis plasticity occurs when the effective stresses Vdefgq@<
0#Pa;(
reach the failure criterium. hkm}oYW+
.VNz(s
The latter is of course more realistic; only the effective stresses determine plasticity, not the water pressures. %&VI-7+K
=$^90Q,Z;
In other words, using total stress analysis is only correct when the calculation is elastic. But this case is not very often in reality.
(n~fe-?}8
}* }F_Y+
Suggestion: Try to use effective stress analysis when it is undrained condition (typically, there is option for this in PLAXIS)." !g6=/9
6-tIe_5
"1) M-C model, undrained condition, effective stress analysis: mMOgx
In this case, the plasticity can be predicted as usual;" zPybPE8
2)M-C model, undrained condition, total stress analysis: maY.Z<lN
S[yrGX8lu
In this case, there is not effective stress calculation due to no pore pressure generate 0^nF: F
VpAwvMw
THESE STATEMENT DO NOT MAKE SENSE TO ME.