论坛首页    职业区    学术与写作    工程技术区    软件区    资料区    商务合作区    社区办公室
 您好! 欢迎 登录 或 注册 最新帖子 邀请注册 活动聚焦 统计排行 社区服务 帮助
 
  • 帖子
  • 日志
  • 用户
  • 版块
  • 群组
帖子
  • 2214阅读
  • 2回复

“千人计划”入选者王志国因造假被加拿大蒙特利尔心脏病研究所关闭实验室(转载) [复制链接]

上一主题 下一主题
离线jeffisonno1
 

发帖
2339
土币
32555
威望
2070
原创币
0
只看楼主 倒序阅读 使用道具 楼主  发表于: 2011-09-06
  • 作者:新语丝
  • 来自:新语丝
“千人计划”入选者王志国因造假被加拿大蒙特利尔心脏病研究所关闭实验室 g-bHf]'  
|zKFF?7#wE  
“千人计划”入选者、加拿大蒙特利尔心脏病研究所兼蒙特利尔大学教授王志国 eYOwdTrq  
因为论文造假,被蒙特利尔心脏病研究所关闭实验室。他发表的两篇与中国工程 +%UfnbZ  
院院士、哈尔滨医科大学教授杨宝峰课题组合作的论文已因造假撤稿,还有3篇 -V%"i,t  
论文被要求撤稿。 l*e*jA_>:7  
;vy"i  
Canadian Press sV%<U-X  
#||^l_  
Date: Friday Sep. 2, 2011 6:50 PM ET ?<%GY dus  
6:fe.0H 9  
MONTREAL — A Montreal hospital has dismissed a renowned cardiac 4703\ HK  
researcher over allegations of scientific misconduct, a case that @_J~zo  
could throw medical studies based on his work into doubt. +>M^p2l*&  
-2{NI.-Xd  
The Montreal Heart Institute revoked Zhiguo Wang's research privileges  |'aGj  
Friday and shuttered his laboratory -- for good. `gDpb.=Y  
:uSo 2d  
The hospital says it launched an investigation earlier this summer J4;w9[a$  
after Wang, who has received millions in federal grants since 1999, AU OL?st  
alerted the institution that he voluntarily retracted two of his iT227v!s  
articles from scientific journals. .-awl1 W  
@aAB#,  
The institute's research director alleges an independent body of Rr{mD#+  
investigators concluded Wang's work did not meet its standards for )R(kXz=M  
scientific conduct. 5N@k9x  
wzwEYZN(q  
"It's very serious," Dr. Jean-Claude Tardif told a news conference ; {iX_%  
Friday at the hospital. &'TZU"_  
y U =) g  
"The reason this is important is that research, like a lot of other m6a`OkP  
things nowadays, is global. zgI!S6q  
*GH` u*C_  
"We need to be absolutely certain that the results that are published '-N `u$3Y  
and shared with the rest of the scientific community around the world Fw)#[  
are indeed exact and respect our highest scientific principles." N^*%{[<5  
6c$ so  
Tardif said the primary results and conclusions in the studies are |a*VoMZ  
still valid, despite the alleged abnormalities in Wang's research. He }~DlOvsq  
added that most of the findings in the research have been duplicated bqWo*>l  
in the works of other scientists. 8iGS=M  
hs!a'E  
Still, he said the hospital had concerns with how images used in the ^<}9#q/rt  
research were manipulated -- and that it must enforce strict &5h{XSv  
scientific standards. &CpxD."8x  
o:W>7~$jr=  
Wang did not immediately respond to interview requests on Friday. F>d B@V-  
Hbn%CdDk1  
Both studies in question were published in different editions of the c>6dlWTqX  
Journal of Biological Chemistry -- one in 2007 and the other in 2008. "jb`KBH%"  
A,Wwt [Qw  
One paper was partially funded with federal cash through the Canadian M%92 ^;|`  
Institutes of Health Research, while the other received financial ;6KcX\g-  
support from the Canadian Diabetes Association. V|gW%Z,j  
;:4&nJ*qG  
The chair of the Canadian Diabetes Association's national research K`{P/w  
council warned that scientists who have since cited Wang's research P<ElH 3J`  
might have to recheck their findings. PzMJ^H{  
 LP-~;  
"People have to go back now and look at their work and see if it was MzM"r"u  
based on something in that paper that wasn't correct," Dr. Bruce HIsIW%B  
Verchere said Friday in an interview. o^&u?F9  
.!e):&(8  
Wang, an award-winning researcher, is no longer eligible to apply for -GCC  
grants from Verchere's association, which has provided more than `*g(_EZsS  
$300,000 for his work since 2003. >E;kM B  
,&e0~  
"It's a shock for us ... because it's donor funds and it's hard to get  Tvqq#;I  
funds," said Verchere, who doubts his organization will be able to IW?).%F  
recoup the money. WYSqnmi  
U5\^[~vW  
"We want to fund the best research -- the research that's going to ^ a^bsKW  
help find a cure, and if the money's not being put to that, it could DvB!- |ek  
have been put to other excellent research." Ti$G2dBO  
sEkfmB2J/  
The Canadian Diabetes Association isn't the only group that lost its WK)hj{k  
investment. %IL] Wz<  
%UT5KYd!=N  
The Canadian Institutes of Health Research said it has granted Wang a aMe]6cWHV>  
total of $4.2 million since 1999, though it did not reveal how much @a$_F3W  
was supplied for the now-retracted study. -d1 YG[1|  
LmWZ43Z"@  
The allegations first made news headlines last month when the Journal zl^ %x1G  
of Biological Chemistry listed the titles of the previously published z6)b XL[f  
articles, but this time with the following statement: "This article &kUEnwQ -  
has been withdrawn by the authors." *:gx1wd  
O]3$$uI=QE  
Tardif, who estimated that tens of thousands have likely read the t~]n"zgovz  
papers in question, said the hospital's investigation has also EmNJ_xY  
prompted recommendations that three more of Wang's published articles [% \>FT[  
be retracted. 6Ri+DPf:  
(0dy,GRN  
He said allegations of scientific misconduct have surfaced elsewhere (H5nz':  
in Canada and internationally, but noted this was a first in the "\cDSiD  
hospital's nearly 60-year history. <`rmQ`(}s  
IO3p&sJ/  
Tardif also stressed that Wang, who is not a physician, worked behind %A64AJZ  
a microscope and never had contact with patients or their medications. U*(/eEtd-  
.ZQD`SRrI  
Wang, who won a pair of prestigious awards in China in 2009 for 1y'8bt~7Pf  
cardiovascular disease research, is also a professor in the faculty of "{(|}Cds  
medicine at Universite de Montreal. C~-x637/  
6 <XQ'tM]N  
He led a team of researchers at the hospital who studied cardiac q!iTDg*$  
arrhythmias -- the rate and rhythm of the heartbeat. >Q3_-yY+  
{RH&mu  
Tardif said Wang published many scientific articles in high-profile ;-sZaU;  
journals while working at the Montreal Heart Institute for close to 20 ]^:sV)  
years. FjR/_GPo6  
10R#} ~D  
"So, he has certainly contributed in a significant way over the last v3O+ ;4  
two decades with his scientific work and (he) has given scientific tg-U x  
talks in important scientific sessions around the world," he said. VRU"2mQ.P6  
IJa6W`}  
离线lanke

发帖
375
土币
3184
威望
2
原创币
0
只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2011-09-25
看不懂,全英语~
离线lxrycn

发帖
102
土币
496
威望
0
原创币
0
只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2011-10-28
以后应该叫999人计划了
快速回复
限100 字节
温馨提示:欢迎交流讨论,请勿纯表情、纯引用!
 
上一个 下一个

      https://beian.mps.gov.cn/ 粤公网安备 44010602012919号 广州半山岩土网络科技有限公司 粤ICP备2024274469号

      工业和信息化部备案管理系统网站