First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology TvwZW!@jc
(a joint event of the 13th ECEE & 30th General Assembly of the ESC) fTzvmC:g7
Geneva, Switzerland, 3-8 September 2006 C#QpQg2
Paper Number: Keynote Address K2 XoXM^*Vk
SEISMIC HAZARD ASSESSMENT: PROBLEMS WITH CURRENT PRACTICE d[[]PX
AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS hrmut*<|
Norman ABRAHAMSON1 w;D+y*2
SUMMARY Gk967pC
This paper addresses issues with current practice in seismic hazard analysis and gives some Us%T;gW
recommendations for improvements. A review of probabilistic and deterministic approaches is /TE_W@?^
given. The remainder of the paper is focused on PSHA. There continue to be hazard studies that p$SX
do not properly treat the ground motion variability, leading to systematic underestimations of the J`^ag'
hazard. Next, some of the short-comings in current PSHA practice that can be improved without J2d.f}-
major revisions to the overall methodology are discussed. These include selecting the bin size for (As#^q\>B
the deaggregation, use of Uniform Hazard Spectra, estimation of scenario spectra, estimation of &6DMk-
epistemic uncertainty, degree of spatial smoothing of seismicity, and the use of a strict lower d[r#-h>dS
bound magnitude. Finally, the future directions of PHSA are addressed. These include L%">iQOG#
incorporating site-specific site response into PSHA and taking project specific structure response Ytgcs(
/$
into account in conducting PHSA.